Print this article

UBP Smiles On Credit Derivatives Exposure

Tom Burroughes

22 June 2020

Cautious investors wary of equity markets kept aloft by central bank money have in the past shifted into cash and debt. But that approach is hard to execute when bonds are expensive and hard to trade. To get exposure to credit markets, what options exist?

One answer, says , is to hold indices of credit default swaps. These indices capture returns generated by CDS, which are insurance-like instruments used to hedge against credit default or capture a yield by selling such insurance. 

The CDS market is more than two decades’ old, and started as an over-the-counter (OTC) market - involving direct trades between counterparties. It was led by banks such as JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank, trading CDS on the debt of governments and companies. After the traumas of the 2008 financial crisis, when the CDS market got some of the blame for inflaming risk rather than spreading it, reforms pushed credit default swaps onto exchanges acting as a central counterparty. This was designed to remove counterparty risk and make the market more transparent. CDS indices in different currency denominations now exist. Investors can use indices to track a whole sector in one hit. 

Funds holding CDS indices outperform the wider fixed income market for a variety of reasons, advocates say. One of them is that CDS indices are more liquid than cash bonds - and that liquidity can actually rise when markets are stressed, while individual bonds’ and loans’ liquidity can dry up, Mohammed Kazmi, portfolio manager of the UBAM - Global High Yield Solution at team’s belief that liquid assets - CDS - would be the first beneficiary of a market normalisation as, unlike bonds, CDS indices have both a long and short investor base and that hedges (short investor base) would be the first positions to be closed in a normalisation,” Kazmi said. 

The index approach also takes out concentration risk in portfolios - investors hold exposure to a diversified basket of names through CDS indices, not just a handful of bonds, he said.  

“Once you strip this all down, it is a fairly simple product to invest in,” Kazmi said.  

During 2019, in US dollar terms, UBP said, the strategy clocked up a 13.4 per cent return, and 0.6 per cent in 2018, returning 7.8 per cent in 2017 and a 9.9 per cent result in 2016, according to figures as at the end of May this year. So far this year, as of the end of May, gross returns are down by 6.9 per cent. The strategy, which is a Luxembourg-registered SICAV structure; can be held under a UCITS fund. There is no initial charge on the fund; it levies an ongoing charge of 0.55 per cent.

Kazmi said the team’s investment strategy is top-down in its approach. As of the end of May, a total of $5.8 billion of client money was held in this fund.

How  to explain some of the superior performance of such funds? 

As a result of the high liquidity, the tight spread between the bid and offer prices of CDS means that the fund does not spend money on high trading turnover among scores of individual bonds.

With a new CDS index series launched every six months, investors can benefit from the roll down of CDS indices, re-investing in each new series on launch, thereby taking advantage of the capital appreciation during the six months when the index rolls closer to maturity.  

There are a number of such indices in the US and Europe. For high yield in the US it is the CDX HY and CDX IG for investment grade. In Europe for high yield it is the iTraxx Crossover and the iTraxx Main for IG. 

A big market
Kazmi argues that CDS indices account for a large majority of total market turnover, overshadowing that of the underlying bond market. “This shows how far the market has come.”

With all the talk about changing economic cycles and moves in risk, investors will not want to hold lots of cash bonds if liquidity dries up. “In the latest risk-off period was very clear,” he said. 

Other benefits of holding CDS indices is that funds can cope with large subscriptions and redemptions - a point worth bearing in mind when some funds have had to shut because of large client pullouts.