Print this article
EXPERT VIEW: Why Family Offices Prefer Direct Investment In Art
Randall Willette
Fine Art Wealth Management
2 May 2013
The following article on family offices and art investments is by Randall
Willette, who is managing director, Fine Art Wealth Management, a specialist
firm in the sector. He is also a member of the editorial advisory board of this
publication and has written several articles about these issues in recent years. Recent trends point toward increased and
continued exposure to direct investments in art particularly among family
offices. Since 2009, family offices have become significantly more
interested in making direct investments following the profound impact of the
economic crisis. According to studies carried out by Wharton Family
Office Alliance, a unit of the University
of Pennsylvania's Wharton School
in Philadelphia
that focuses on wealthy families and their businesses, families have almost
doubled their investment allocations to direct investments in companies
and property. More recently, this trend has extended
to art supported by the latest Art &
Finance Report just released by Deloitte/ArtTactic. In a survey of
wealth management professionals 53 per cent stated that the challenging economic
environment has been the main motivation for their clients to include art in
their overall wealth portfolio in 2012 (up from 28 per cent in 2011). A
large majority (60 per cent) of wealth managers believe this trend will
continue even stronger in the future. What's driving this movement? However,
increasingly the trend in family offices seems to be heading down the path of
direct investment. These trends are a result of deep
concerns over transparency and poor performance of fund managers in general. For
art funds specifically, the difficulty in assessing their viability, small size
and relatively flat growth, and lack of track record have also been major
obstacles according to the Deloitte/ArtTactic report. The rate of direct investment is increasing as
family offices start to look more and more like private equity, venture
capital, and hedge funds. What's compelling is that family offices do
not have to pay the "2 & 20" typically garnered by art fund
managers. Along with paying management and performance
fees, investors in art funds may also be required to commit their money
for long periods of time. All this suggests a trend that
has momentum and may have profound effects on the art fund space over the
coming years. Motivations of direct investment in art? The decision to invest directly stems
from a combination of emotional and financial motivations. To date, research on
the direct investment asset class has largely considered only economic motives,
excluding non-financial concerns. Yet, many investors are motivated by a variety
of emotional rationales, particularly when considering direct investments in
art. These reasons include the desire to:
preserve control and remain active; educate family members; achieve
social impact; and secure wealth across generations. Preserve control Direct investment in art is for family offices that
have a strategy to be active and have a high level of control over the
underlying investment - in essence for those who want to physically own the
art. An art investor can take part in/control key decision-making, in
particular the exit. The issue with direct investing is the degree and
length of commitment that is required, which means the family office must have
an internal team or outsource to art market professionals. Without this a
family office cannot successfully source, execute, and monitor an art
investment portfolio. The benefit of hiring a team is you can craft and
control it, however the challenge is attracting and retaining expensive talent
and ongoing costs. A family office must use the expertise of internal
and external teams to assess economic conditions, financial and art market
dynamics, and other variables it believes may influence the prices, activity,
availability of supply, and future attractiveness of opportunities identified
for investment. These opportunities are generated by the underlying
dynamic of the art market which is inefficient, illiquid, lacks price
transparency and has highly differentiated products. Similar to private equity,
a family office must not only engage in the right transaction at the right time
and at the right price, but it must also enhance the value of each artwork
through a variety of curatorial and marketing activities commonly practiced by
successful collectors and dealers. Social impact Investing directly in art also provides a greater
opportunity for collecting families to maximise social impact. The line between
for-profit businesses and philanthropy has been blurring as social impact
investments have shown that a financially sustainable business model can
achieve far greater impact than charity, given its ability to scale. Today, the private collections of ultra high
net worth families can rival those of major art institutions and by joining
forces an extended family unit can make a significant social impact. Private museums are being created at
an outstanding rate, and for many collecting families giving has
become synonymous with investing as families seek to give back to their
communities by sharing their passion for art with the public. Families with exceptional art wealth are
moving toward an increased focus on using their collections and their wealth to
realise what they define as a richer life and to achieve a greater sense of
fulfilment for themselves and for their community.
With their collections as their core, and with their missions of civic
responsibility and building community, collecting families can make a meaningful
contribution to the preservation of cultural heritage and diversity. Professional development Direct investment in art and art related businesses
can provide opportunities for professional development and knowledge of
the global art market for family members and to pass down an
understanding of the family collection that future generations can benefit
from. Dealing professionally with art requires time and considerable knowledge.
Obtaining recognition as an art expert generally requires intense study whether
theoretical, academic or practical. Even the most experienced collecting
families can benefit from professional guidance in today's fast paced and
complex art market. Scope for unmatched financial returns in the art market Finally, and certainly not least, direct
investments in art and art related businesses allow scope for unmatched
financial return. For the already well-established, this economic
motivation is clearly rooted in the desire to achieve family wealth
sustainability. For example, family offices can obtain high potential returns by responding to the
shortage of capital in the art market, and actively deploying capital in art
financing transactions. Family offices can
provide art dealers, auction houses, and other market entities with the
resources necessary to make timely investments where traditional banks,
unfamiliar with art world practices and dynamics, impose prohibitive
terms. In exchange for providing financing to these groups, family offices
can enjoy a share of the financial upside of these transactions. In the future
we may expect to see more family offices invest in art-related businesses,
commission works of art, or provide backing for commissions in conjunction with
galleries, dealers, and institutions and the artists themselves, in exchange
for participation in future profits from sales. Co-investment Family offices with particular expertise in sectors
of the art market are also increasingly seeking to collaborate with others to
leverage the investment opportunities they identify. The attraction of
co-investment opportunities include the fact that the family office typically
has significant “skin in the game,” a demonstrated expertise, and the ability
to add value beyond capital (eg, via business skills, art expertise,
proprietary deal flow, or art market intelligence). We foresee a steady rise in shared due diligence
and co-investments in art among family offices, facilitated by increasingly
formalised structures that will fall into two broad categories. Buying art works
in partnership with art dealers While a family office will generally acquire direct
ownership of an art work, in certain circumstances it may own an art work in
partnership with an art dealer. A family office may also enter into arrangements with selected dealers to share in the potential upside of a painting by
receiving remuneration at such time the painting is sold. The family office may also seek to take
advantage of current market conditions and perceived inefficiencies by
purchasing and selling certain art works within short periods of time. Co-investment
with Auction Houses Family offices may also seek
higher returns by selectively deploying capital to the auction houses and by
participating in guarantees extended by the auction houses to a select number
of important sellers of art works on pre-agreed terms and conditions. In
exchange for participating in guarantees with auction houses family offices
will enjoy a share of the financial upside or downside of these transactions. Conclusion Direct investment
is a documented trend among family offices that is picking up traction and may
be ready to emerge full-force in the art market in the near term. Due to the nature of family offices, this is
particularly interesting for a market actively seeking to raise capital. Unlike private equity firms, family offices
can be very quick on their feet, are flexible, and that flexibility can
translate to opportunistic investment in art and art-related businesses. While the growing interest in direct deals from family investors is
understandable, we would also counsel caution. Those wishing to invest
directly in art should consider whether they really have the expertise and
the proprietary deal flow to compete effectively in the global art market.
Historically,
single and multi-family offices hired asset managers to help allocate capital
in order to preserve wealth for future generations. The majority of this
capital was traditionally placed into the hands of asset managers that focused
on conservative holdings. At the same time, however, almost every family office
maintains a smaller pool of capital for riskier assets. In the past, this
capital was placed into higher-risk vehicles like hedge funds, private equity
funds and more recently art investment funds with the hope of achieving higher
returns.