Print this article
IFA Luminary Is Unhappy As Private Equity Firms Eye UK Wealth Manager Targets
Tom Burroughes
12 December 2013
Amid the flurry of merger and acquisition activity among
UK-based wealth managers and advisors in recent months, one small but
noticeable trend has been the involvement of private equity. And an outspoken
practitioner in the UK
sectors is concerned about this pattern. In early November, Permira, one of the largest private
equity houses in Europe, purchased Bestinvest, the UK
wealth management and advisory firm; Bridgepoint, another private equity firm
bought Quilter, the UK
investment house, from Morgan Stanley, in early 2012. (Quilter has subsequently
joined with Cheviot Asset Management.) In 2011, Duke Street acquired a majority interest
in UK Wealth Management, an IFA. As late as this November, there were media
reports – so far not substantiated officially – that Permira was poised to
buy the UK
wealth management business of Deutsche Bank. Belgian investment firm RHJ
International bought Kleinwort Benson, the venerable UK
private bank, from Germany’s
Commerzbank in 2009 (the German firm was forced to sell its non-domestic
businesses as a condition of receiving state bailout aid). In a related field – trusts - Doughty Hanson, another
private equity firm, bought Equity Trust in 2010; in September 2009, Waterland
Private Equity Investments, a firm with operations in the Netherlands, Germany
and Belgium,
bought out Intertrust, operating in the global trust and corporate management
services business. Given that private equity buyout players typically have a three-
or five-year horizon over which they realise their clients’ investments (or
else suffer a nasty bite to internal rates of return), are such organisations
likely to have wealth management clients’ best interests at heart? No in most cases, argues
Brian Spence, founder of Harrison Spence, a business advising IFAs and similar
organisations about M&A. “The raison d’etre
of private equity firms is to achieve, often ambitious, returns for investors.
With a 3-5 year time horizon typical and their eye on a sale to another company
or IPO, private equity firms often have ambitious growth plans and want to
build scale quickly. For this reason, their focus is mainly on obtaining
assets. The acquisition of larger firms is the best way to do this and firms
with £500,000 plus in fund-based renewals are especially sought after, with no
upper limit on the size of the deal,” Spence told WealthBriefing. He said the regulators who have pushed the Retail
Distribution Review programme of UK reforms – with its impact in
pushing up costs and creating “orphans” among smaller clients who are
increasingly excluded from affordable financial advice – have to a certain
extent created a situation where private equity firms are able to pick up such
companies. “As many smaller firms struggle due to the regulatory and
administrative demands on them post-RDR, it is creating opportunities in the
industry. Shrewd outside investors are taking advantage of this,” he said. Spence said the regulatory
cost burden has an impact that those who implement it are often constitutionally
incapable of appreciating. “The regulator tends to have a civil service mentality.
Working with entrepreneurial IFA businesses is therefore always going to be
conflicted-to the detriment rather than the benefit of the end user, the
client,” he continued. “The buyers of businesses that see the potential in and are
dominating M&A activity in the industry at present have widely differing
models,” he said. Spence is at pains to stress that not all buyers of such
businesses have a short-termist mindset, and for those who take a longer view,
the benefits should be worth it. “Some do have a short-term profit motive, but others take a
longer term view of what they buy and this will naturally benefit the service
proposition to the end-client,” he said. RDR impact Spence is not the only person to reckon that the RDR, and a
general rise in costs, is forcing consolidation among advisory businesses,
attracting in private equity players that have traditionally not been a
prominent type of owner in this space. (Wealth managers have traditionally been
likely to invest in private equity than the other way round.) Stephen Wall, senior analyst at Aite Group, the consultants,
noted in a recent blog comment that Permira’s Bestinvest deal is a sign that
private equity activity may significantly increase, after a number of false
dawns. He wrote: “Under the RDR regulatory regime, it is common knowledge that
firms are being squeezed and deals are coming to market.” “The interesting thing for Permira, compared to RHJ
International and Bridgepoint, however, is that the firm is closer positioned
to the huge independent financial advisor space, smaller discretionary fund
managers, and the online advice market, throwing open a very interesting
prospect for Permira, and one that was no doubt in its strategic thinking: It
is now positioned to fill the famed "advice gap" - where millions are
thought to have been left without access to financial advice under the RDR as
firms have focused on higher value and wealthier clients - and responding to
investors' increased appetite for self-service and supported platforms,” Wall
added.