Offshore
"Panama Papers" Force Chilean Head Of Transparency International To Quit

An organization dedicated to exposing dirty money has seen one of its own figures resign because of links to offshore firms, although no illegal activity is alleged.
The unfolding saga known as the “Panama Papers” continued to
claim high-profile victims when the president of the Chilean
branch of Transparency International, a group that seeks to shine
a light on dirty money, resigned after leaked documents showed he
was linked to at least five offshore firms, media reports
said.
Transparency
International has stated that Gonzalo Delaveau has resigned
as the president of Transparency Chile, which has been accepted
by the board of directors. He isn’t accused of illegal
activity.
Delaveau is among a large number of persons identified in a leak,
or theft, of documents stretching back to 1977 from law firm
Mossack Fonseca, which is based in Panama.
The "Panama Papers" were leaked to more than 100 news
organizations worldwide cooperating with the US-based
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, or ICIJ,
including Chilean watchdog CIPER.
Ironically, when the story broke, Transparency International
yesterday denounced what it saw as the abuse of offshore centers.
In a statement, TI said: “Transparency International calls on the
international community to act immediately to adopt transparency
laws to outlaw secret companies.”
Delaveau, a lawyer, reportedly acts as a representative for
Turnbrook Corporation, DK Corporation, Heatlhey International
Inc, Turnbrook Mining Ltd and Vizcachitas Ltd, all of which are
domiciled in the Bahamas, Reuters said. Delaveau
also serves as a director for Turnbrook Mining, which owns 51.6
per cent of Los Andes Copper, a Canadian exploration and
development company currently focused on a mine project north of
Chile's capital, Santiago, the news service said. Deleveau
has reportedly said he was a director only at Turnbrook Mining
and that his relations with the other companies were consistent
with his role as a lawyer and legal clerk.
Chile's tax authority announced the beginning of an "intense
follow-up" of the Chileans mentioned in the Panama Papers, who
range from ex-soccer stars to newspaper magnates. Other
jurisdictions, such as the UK, Australia, US and New Zealand, are
launching probes or ready to do so.
Toxic
The issue is particularly toxic for politicians in countries,
such as the UK and US, who have denounced the secrecy of offshore
centers such as Switzerland and demanded more disclosure, to the
point where this has raised concerns about protection of
legitimate privacy. In Latin America, for example, there are
worries that complete transparency could put wealthy persons at
risk of extortion or kidnap. A continued challenge is drawing a
dividing line between legitimate privacy and secrecy. (For more
on this issue, see here.)
The Panama Papers, a massive leak of financial documents, reveal
the offshore holdings of 140 politicians and public officials,
including 12 current and former world leaders, who used more than
214,000 offshore entities to hide the ownership of assets.
José Ugaz, the chair of Transparency International, said on his
organization’s website: “The Panama Papers investigation unmasks
the dark side of the global financial system where banks, lawyers
and financial professionals enable secret companies to hide
illicit corrupt money. This must stop. World leaders must come
together and ban the secret companies that fuel grand corruption
and allow the corrupt to benefit from ill-gotten wealth”.
The body said it wants to see a “renewed push” for Group of 20
countries to agree that public beneficial ownership registers
should be the global standard, and sanctions applied to
jurisdictions that do not conform to this standard. This would
include not just the G20, but also the numerous
Transparency International has named the US state of Delaware,
home to thousands of anonymous shell companies thanks to its
strict corporate secrecy rules, as part of its Unmask the Corrupt
campaign specifically because its corporate registration rules
help people hide the true owners of companies.