Tax
Advisors Must Wise Up To Insurance's Power In Easing Inheritance Tax Pain

Life insurance is a well established market and yet under-appreciated as a means of settling tax on inheritance. For wealthy foreigners facing steep bills in the UK, and where traditional trust approaches have been shut down, the need to examine insurance is increasingly urgent, practitioners say.
After the UK government scrapped the UK resident non-dom system
and, in particular, turned the screws up on how inheritance is
taxed, it prompted private client advisors to ask what tools
could be used to moderate the pain.
While traditional structures such as trusts appear less robust
for IHT purposes, options remain, such as forms of life
insurance. However, advocates of this argue that advisors
aren’t sufficiently attuned to insurance particularly for
overseas investors.
“A problem is that many wealth managers, lawyers and other
parties have little idea about the uses for insurance in this
area,” Tim Searle, a veteran advisor to HNW individuals, told
this publication. Searle, who has been working offshore for three
decades, is based in Dubai.
At the core of the idea is that if a policy can pay out money to
cover a tax bill, paying to set this policy up will be far less
expensive overall than the alternative of having to meet this
eventual liability, borrow money to pay the bill if possible, or
break up a farm, sell assets or other businesses. All assets pass
to the control of HMRC on death, and probate can only be settled
when all dues are met.
The use of insurance in the UK to handle such matters remains
low-key, contrasting with insurance often being a cornerstone,
even dominant, route in markets such as Greater China, and in the
US, for example.
Searle is not alone in seeing growth potential. Life insurers
should benefit from the IHT changes made by UK Chancellor of the
Exchequer Rachel Reeves last year, Liz Palmer, head of private
wealth, at London-based law firm Howard
Kennedy, told this publication.
“Life insurance will be a problem-solver for a lot of people,”
she said. “For non-doms who have decided to leave the UK and sell
all UK assets, there is a 'tail’ that means they will stay within
the scope of IHT for much longer and insuring this risk could be
an attractive solution,” she said.
Another idea that HNW families might explore, Palmer said, are
family investment companies, which were not affected by the 2024
budget. They come with certain tax exemptions. However, if the
concept were to become more popular there is a risk that it could
encourage HMRC to examine them more closely.
So how does the insurance route work?
Searle explains that an insurance policy could be structured so
that, for example, if a person gifts an estate to an heir, the
policy would cover the seven-year transfer period, which still
has an exposure to IHT. These are sometimes referred to as
inter-vivos policies but many investors do not wish to gift due
to the lack of control of the asset(s). Conversely, a whole of
life policy could cover the IHT liability; the value of the
amount being insured is set at the outset, and will grow over
time since in reality the property’s value will rise over the
decades. Policies have to be dynamic since the liability grows as
the asset(s) increase, he said.
Another important feature for offshore policies is that a policy
can be surrendered and money refunded about 15 years after a
policy is initiated if it is no longer needed to cover this IHT
liability, Searle said.
Searle said he works with a client’s advisor to establish a
policy for a client in a trust for their beneficiaries, as this
means that the proceeds will remain outside the estate. This
money can then be used to pay some, or all, of the IHT due by
HMRC.
A different environment
It may be that in the past advisors have found it more
lucrative to promote other ways to mitigate IHT, and the trusts
sector has been a part of that. But with the harsh realities of
Reeves’ changes taking effect, the hunt for alternatives is bound
to become more intense.
Reeves has frozen the nil-rate band IHT threshold of £325,000
($400,000) until 2030; inherited pensions will be brought into
inheritance tax from 2027.
Agricultural Relief and Business Property Relief have also been
changed, meaning that from April 2026, the first £1 million of
qualifying combined assets will have no inheritance tax at all,
but for assets over £1 million a 50 per cent relief will apply,
at an effective rate of 20 per cent. Qualifying shares on the
Alternative Investment Market (AIM) will no longer have full
exemption from IHT, instead from 2026 they will have an
inheritance tax rate of 20 per cent if they are held for two
years.
Changes since 2017
UK legislation, retroactive to 2017, states that all foreign
owners of residential property are liable to up to 40 per cent
inheritance tax, regardless of what structures (such as special
purpose vehicles and trusts) they have set up or where they are
domiciled. Those changes brought most UK property assets under
the scope of IHT regardless of what sort of trust structure,
offshore company, nationality, domicile, residence or passport
was employed.
Before 2017, the most effective method for foreigners to purchase
residential property in the UK was by an offshore company and
trust which managed not only IHT but capital gains tax too.
Jurisdictions such as the British Virgin Islands, Jersey and
Guernsey profited from it. However, Searle said, that approach no
longer works.
“It is crucial for UK advisory to appreciate that international
insurance options exist to give foreign investors the comfort of
retaining control of the asset and ensuring liquidity is
immediately available for when this eventuality occurs,” Searle
said. “There are few options open to foreign investors in the UK
not only because of their overseas status but there are better
options open to them internationally. UK advisory need to expand
their ubiquitous domestic advice if they are to serve overseas
clients accurately taking into consideration all the options open
to them.”
A view from Geneva
Cécile Civiale Vuillier, TEP, partner at Trustconsult
(Suisse), in Geneva, explained how the landscape has changed
and the value insurance brings.
“As a responsible trustee firm, we've proactively engaged with
all clients affected by these changes to review their UK property
holding structures. This review process considers both the
revised tax implications and the broader needs of each family.
Many families continue to value trusts for legitimate reasons
beyond tax efficiency – particularly for maintaining privacy
between heirs and ensuring professional asset management across
generations,” she said. “It's important to acknowledge that
maintaining trust structures does involve costs, including the
fees now levied by HMRC. However, when approached holistically,
trusts still offer significant value when integrated with
complementary planning tools.
“Insurance solutions work particularly effectively alongside
trusts in this new environment. When structured properly,
insurance provides trustees with immediate liquidity upon the
passing of the ultimate beneficial owner – enabling them to
settle IHT liabilities promptly, clear estate debts, and
distribute legacy assets to beneficiaries while the broader
estate progresses through probate,” she said.
“This combined approach allows trustees to fulfil their core
mission: protecting assets for future generations while
navigating tax obligations efficiently. While trusts can no
longer 'shield' UK residential property from IHT, they remain
essential components in comprehensive estate planning when
deployed strategically with other solutions like properly
structured insurance,” Vuillier added.
Costs
Howard Kennedy’s Palmer said that for some people the cost of
keeping the trust will be a trade-off between a 6 per cent IHT
charge on the value of the trust every 10 years and the asset
protection risks of putting the assets into the hands of
beneficiaries who might not cope with the wealth. This might be
preferable if bringing the trust to an end.
Searle argues that insurance is a far cheaper option than using a
trust in this case, however.
“De-envelope the trust, keep it in the client name, retain full
control, deploy an insurance contract to meet the IHT, and then
pass to heirs as per your wishes on death,” he said.
Changing tack away from IHT mitigation, this news service asked
Palmer what else she sees people doing in the hope of reducing
general tax burdens.
With certain HNW individuals who already have a connection to
another country, they may consider moving, she said. “They
need to ask 'could I live here on a full-time basis?’” she
said.
However, the allure of abroad brings risks, Palmer added.