Compliance
Cayman Islands Stirs Beneficial Ownership Debate

The Caribbean jurisdiction is considering a "legitimate interest" test to determine which persons and organisations should have access to public registers of companies' beneficial owners.
The government of the Cayman Islands has given a fresh twist to
the debate over beneficial ownership public registers since this
idea was rejected just over a year ago by a top European
court.
Next year, the Ministry of Financial Services and Commerce will
work with “relevant stakeholders” to allow the introduction of an
“enhanced beneficial ownership framework under” the new
Beneficial Ownership Transparency Act, a statement from the
Caribbean jurisdiction said late last week.
The government said it remains committed to bringing in public
registers of public ownership of companies.
Debate
was stirred in 2022 when the Court of Justice of
the European Union’s (CJEU) ruled against public registers.
Last week, the British
Virgin Islands appeared to row back from going for complete
public disclosure by referring to a “legitimate interest test” to
be shown by people seeking access to beneficial ownership data.
The Cayman Islands appears to be taking a similar line.
The Cayman government said: “We are currently progressing to
provide access to those members of the public who meet the
'legitimate interest test’ required by that case. This will
include access to parties who are genuinely seeking information
so as to prevent or combat money laundering and terrorist
financing (for instance media and civil society organisations
under specific circumstances per the ECJ Judgment). We anticipate
that this enhanced beneficial ownership framework will be
introduced no later than Q4 2024.”
Statements from the Cayman Islands and BVI highlight how
significant the CJEU ruling – which provoked
criticism from those demanding more transparency in the fight
against illicit finance and tax evasion – has been. For years,
governments around the world have pushed for more openness about
beneficial ownership, although privacy campaigners have also
warned that without safeguards, important information could fall
into the wrong hands, such as kidnappers. (This publication
has
commented on this matter.)
In late October the Financial Action Task Force, aka FATF, said
it welcomed
moves by the Cayman Islands and Panama in making progress to
improve their AML and CFT regimes. (The FATF is an
intergovernmental group focused on fighting money laundering and
counter-terrorism finance.)
The legislation grants access to the Cayman Islands central
register of beneficial ownership information by “competent
authorities, law enforcement agencies, licensed financial
institutions, and the public,” the government said.
“We recognise that the UK continues to champion anti-money
laundering and counter-terrorist financing efforts,” André
Ebanks, Minister of Financial Services and Commerce, said in the
statement. “As such, the Cayman Islands greatly values our
partnership with the UK, along with our sister Overseas
Territories and Crown Dependencies, to protect the global
financial system and the public from criminality and illicit
financial flows.”
“This framework will make strides towards greater transparency,
in accord with the updated commitment to the UK and also to
prepare for the Financial Action Task Force’s 5th Round of Mutual
Evaluations,” Ebanks said.
“We fully acknowledge the importance of aligning with evolving
global standards and, in this regard, we are actively taking
steps to meet the new FATF standards related to transparency, as
demonstrated by the passage of the Beneficial Ownership
Transparency Act on the 23rd November 2023. This Act will provide
for access to the Cayman Islands central register of beneficial
ownership information by competent authorities, law enforcement
agencies, licensed financial institutions, and the public,” the
Cayman Islands’ government statement continued.
“We are dedicated to maintaining our strong bilateral partnership with the United Kingdom in all respects, including jointly combatting illicit financial flows in a proportionate manner in order to achieve a responsible and transparent global financial system,” the jurisdiction’s government added.