Art
INTERVIEW: Pictet, Private Equity House Take Art Investment Up A Gear With Athena
One of the world's biggest alternative investment firms - Carlyle - and Pictet, the private bank, have recently invested in a business focused on art finance. This publication spoke to some of the participants.
Eye-popping prices paid for art in all parts of the world - such
as Asia, for example - have stirred investment interest from
investors and the infrastructure of the market for such works has
also developed. And a new shift involves the coming together of a
US private equity titan and a venerable Swiss private bank. It is
designed, so those involved say, to make the art investment
business more liquid and flexible.
As commented upon in these pages several weeks ago (see
here), New York-headquartered Athena Art
Finance has launched with $280 million of equity capital led
by The
Carlyle Group and the private equity unit of Pictet, the
Geneva-headquartered private bank. Athena’s chief executive is
Andrea Danese, a structured finance veteran who, along with his
colleagues, wants to use some of the tools of modern finance to
shake up the art world.
Art is a relatively illiquid asset class – artworks have their
unique qualities – and typically requires considerable research
and diligence. This market has at times seen heavy inflows from
investors seeking “real assets” in this age of central bank money
printing, but the fortunes of art investment have been mixed –
there have been a number of sharp setbacks.
So what is new about Athena?
This publication recently spoke to Pictet and Athena’s Danese
about Athena and how he hopes it can build a new type of
offering. He has the kind of background associated more with the
dealing rooms of Wall Street, the City or Hong Kong than an
auction house or hushed art gallery. He worked in the realm of
investment banking for more than 20 years, toiling at JP Morgan
and Deutsche Bank. During some of this time he worked in the
credit derivatives market; in 2000 he started Creditex, a credit
derivatives trading platform, and then he went to work for
financial news and data firm Bloomberg on the financial market
data side, before leaving in 2014. With his background in modern
financial techniques and his interest in and passion for art came
the inspiration for the Athena business model.
One key offering is art-backed lending and financing as a
standalone business offering.
“It [Athena] is a non-bank lender, lending against art as
collateral. We don’t have a banking licence since we do not take
deposits. We don’t have to maintain regulatory capital
requirements and we can afford to lend on a non-recourse basis.
This means there is no recourse on any other asset on the balance
sheet of the borrower,” Danese said.
Clients of such a business can range from a billionaire who wants
to leverage his/her art collection to finance other investments
and purchases, through to someone, such as a person with a
multi-million collection who wants to buy new art and use
existing art as collateral for a loan, and who does not want to
risk all his/her wealth if a deal goes wrong, he said.
“We tend to lend money at mid to high single-digit rates,” he
said, such as at Libor+700-900 basis points; this level is some
way above conventional recourse-loan lending, given the different
assets that can be claimed in the event of a default.
Danese said his firm isn’t particularly “revolutionary” (other
organisations such as Citi Private
Bank enable art owners to use items as collateral) but
what is distinct is that it is the only clear-cut example of a
standalone business financing art, he said.
“It will help the art market to grow and to give more access to
this market and the marketplace will develop where art can be
traded as a financial asset and seen as part of a person’s
balance sheet,” he said.
Securities
“What we will achieve is to give access to art risk in the form
of securities. We can start to create things such as structured
notes. Athena will not just be a lender but a market maker in
terms of art risk. It is at present a relatively inefficient
and underdeveloped market,” he said.
Greater market sophistication should, other things being equal,
lead to improved liquidity, although as other market episodes
have shown down the years, liquidity can dry up in an abrupt
market downturn.
Data on returns shows that art can play a part in an investment
portfolio, as well as give a bit of excitement to those whose
heartbeat doesn’t race around the topics of stocks and bonds.
Citigroup, in a recent Global Perspectives & Solutions report on
art investing, has this to say: “Looking at over 100 years of
data, art has underperformed equities but outperformed bonds.
Over time there is a clear link between art prices and the global
economy.
“For example, some of the strongest falls in art prices were
observed during World War I, in the early 1930s, following the
1973 oil crisis, in the early 1990s and after the 2008 financial
crisis. Overall, we conclude that art deserves a place within
illiquid asset holdings for those who would otherwise hold art
for many reasons. However, successful investment in art appears
to be much more a question of identifying relative value than it
is of gaining exposure to the market as a whole,” it said.
That report also pointed out that art’s superior investment
performance to some mainstream asset classes clearly explains
much of its allure.
“The global auction market for fine art has grown dramatically
since the turn of the millennium, when sales were about $3
billion in total. Since then, global auction turnover has grown
at an average annual compound rate of 13 per cent, reaching $16.1
billion in 2014. Not bad considering that the period was
punctuated by the deepest global recession in almost a century.
By way of context, in the same timeframe global GDP and exports
grew at 3.5 and 8.1 per cent per year, respectively. The art
market clearly outperformed, even during a time of solid average
growth in economic activity and substantial advances in
globalisation,” the bank said.
Among other data, the Citigroup study noted that in the last 88
years, annual real (excluding inflation) returns on art have been
3.7 per cent, while those for real estate have been 7.7 per cent,
and for the S&P 500 Index of stocks, 6.8 per cent. For
10-year US Treasury notes, it is 1.9 per cent, and on gold, 1.6
per cent.
How it works
Athena has said that loans will be made against artworks with
highly marketable value, meeting the needs of high net worth
individuals, family offices, and other market participants whose
current options are limited to the recourse art-loans offered by
the major private banking institutions or the short-term loans
offered at double digit-rates by boutique lenders.
The firm says it expects to provide additional flexibility to
financial advisors, estate planners, lawyers and other
professionals who may now manage their clients’ collections as
rationally as the rest of their asset portfolio.
Pictet’s involvement
Pierre-Alain Wavre, chairman of Pictet Wealth Management's
investment committee, told this publication that his firm’s
collaboration with Carlyle over backing such a venture as Athena
was part of a pattern of work with Carlyle that goes back more
than 20 years.
The move to invest in art was part of an ongoing examination by
Pictet at new opportunities for investment, he said.
“Art has had a fantastic run and there is tremendous value to be
had there; there hasn’t been an institution that only specialises
in that space. There are some players, such as banks, who have
done work in this area, but not a specialist firm,” Wavre
continued.
“If you can finance a plane or a boat then you can finance
art.”
There are a variety of institutions and people who need art
finance, such as persons with collections who are not ready or
able to sell but who want to add to a collection, or those with
succession and wealth transfer issues, he said. Museums, dealers
and others need financing for new acquisitions, etc. “There are a
lot of different actors who need access to art finance,” he
said.
Art can be a strong source of collateral, he said. It is
important to adhere to strict limits and disciplines over issues
such as loan-to-value ratios, and have a clear understanding of
the underlying market, its liquidity, and other factors, he
said.
“We are looking for a return on equity of around 10 to 15 per
cent,” he added.