Legal
College Admission Cheating Saga Embroils Ex-PIMCO Chief Executive, HNW Individuals

The allegations cast an unflattering light on US college admission procedures and the influence of money.
Douglas Hodge, a former chief executive of US-based asset
management house Pacific Investment Management, aka PIMCO, and a venture capital CEO
are among those charged earlier this week with a criminal plot to
help with applications to enter elite schools such as Stanford,
Yale, UCLA and Georgetown, media reports have said. Additionally,
Hollywood actresses Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin, and a
number of chief executives, are among 50 wealthy people
charged in the largest college cheating fraud ever
prosecuted by the US Department of Justice, reports
said.
The charges against a raft of individuals, including university
coaches, parents and a college-admissions counsellor, shed light
on the alleged sharp practices people have used to get young
adults into leading academic institutions.
One of the charged individuals is Manuel A Henriquez,
founder and chairman of Hercules Capital, reports
said. Another is Bruce Isackson, cofounder of WP
Investments, a California real estate firm.
The saga, if the charges stick, will be sure to grab the
attention of the many ultra-high net worth individuals who have
gifted billions of dollars to academic institutions in recent
years (see
some coverage here). The affair may also raise questions over
whether such gifts are also attempts to help offspring obtain
academic places.
Parents paid from $100,000 to $6.5 million in bribes, with most
payments about $200,000, according to prosecutors,
Bloomberg and other news services said.
"The parents are a catalog of wealth and privilege," Andrew
Lelling, the US Attorney in Boston, was quoted as saying at a
news conference. "The case is about the widening corruption of
elite college admissions through the steady application of wealth
combined with fraud."
Investigators detailed a scandal that perverted much of the
admissions process for America's elite colleges. Unlike most
other SAT cheating cases, the scheme reached deep into the
academy, implicating college officials who allegedly subverted
the missions of the universities themselves.
Prosecutors claimed that clients paid $25 million in bribes to
coaches and administrators from 2011 to 2018. In some cases, the
bribes would be disguised as charitable contributions.
The affair also comes at a time when, a year out from the next US
presidential elections, the status of super-wealthy individuals
is likely to come under assault. Such stories, even if they are
proven incorrect, can be politically toxic. The Democrat Party
has seen individuals such as Senator Elizabeth Warren, for
example, champion the case for a wealth tax. In New York, as
reported here, politicians are mulling a tax on luxury homes
owned by non-residents.