All eyes have been on gold as it hit new highs last week reaching more than $2,000 an ounce, largely driven by COVID-related monetary policy. It marks a 14 per cent rise since the end of June but pales compared with the 54 per cent rise in silver for the same period as investors flock to precious metal safe havens. This macro view explores where gold is heading.
This week, Unigestion’s multi-asset investment manager, Salman Baig, runs through the macro view for gold and indications that momentum is set to stall. The unwinding of long positions causing outflows from gold ETFs (and to a lesser degree in futures) is one short-term risk. Another, as revealed by data from the World Gold Council, is that demand for gold jewellery in Q2 fell by 53 per cent year-on-year in mass terms, while demand from technology use (including electronics, industrial, and dentistry) fell by 18 per cent. We have written several articles about the gold market, given its recent movements.
This publication wrote last week about the commodities' role in portfolios. We welcome this latest commentary where the usual disclaimers apply. Get in touch by emailing firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com.
What's the current picture?
The precious metal has benefitted from several tailwinds, some of which we expect to continue while others are likely to stabilise or even reverse. The longer-term factors – expansive monetary policy, negative real rates, and solid demand from price-insensitive players – are all supportive for gold and likely to continue. However, shorter-term factors, such as record inflows, strong momentum, and substitution, suggest a more nuanced view. Until the short-term factors fade behind us, we maintain a more neutral exposure to gold within our portfolios.
For almost two months now, our indicators have pointed to a rather benign environment for financial assets: global recession risk and inflation risk have hovered around neutral, while the risk of a market stress episode has been low. Such an environment would typically be a rather poor one for gold: many investors view gold as a contra-currency and storehold of wealth, and flock to it when fears of inflation or crisis arise.
Indeed, our analysis of the performance of gold in such a macro environment provides empirical support for this economic intuition and points towards a negative view on the precious metal. At the same time, the valuation of gold looks expensive: the futures curve is in deeper-than-usual contango, with prices of further-dated futures contracts bid more than shorter-dated ones, making a long position in gold futures more expensive relative to its own history. Gold also remains expensive from a cross-asset perspective, pushing the net view from our systematic investment process to be bearish.
Monetary policy has been and is likely to remain
However, there are some key supports to gold that have overwhelmed these negative factors and are unlikely to reverse in the near term. Foremost among these is the coordination of fiscal and monetary policy to fight off the coronavirus-induced economic contraction, especially in the US.
As we have communicated previously, the amount of fiscal stimulation is massive and financed largely by issuing debt. However, central bank purchases have kept nominal yields from rising, helping to ensure that governments can borrow at low rates and incentivising investors to allocate to higher yielding and riskier assets. At the same time, inflation expectations have recovered strongly and are back to near pre-crisis levels.
The net impact of these forces has been declining and negative real rates. For example, the US two-year real rate has collapsed by 250bps since late March. The expansionary policy of the Fed, combined with an acceleration of cases in the US versus other developed countries and China, has put downward pressure on the US dollar.
With gold typically quoted in US dollars, negative US real rates and a falling greenback have a significant impact on the price of gold, which becomes even more attractive as a storehold of wealth when cash, treasury bills, and bonds are all offering negative real yields. And, unlike nominal yields that have a lower bound (though not necessarily zero, as the Eurozone experience has shown), real yields can move significantly negative.
It is clear to us that the Fed and other central banks will not be concerned by an inflation overshoot any time soon and are likely to tolerate inflation much above their targets if the economy is still in need of recovery. Thus, while inflation expectations have recovered to pre-crisis levels, there remains ample room for them to move higher, while nominal yields will remain anchored by central banks, potentially leading real rates to fall further and supporting another leg in the gold rally.
Supply and demand have reinforced the rally so
Monetary policy is just one part of gold’s recent surge: physical supply and demand have also been critical. Not surprisingly, supply has been flat while consumer demand for gold has fallen due to lower economic activity.
According to data from the World Gold Council, demand for gold jewellery in Q2 2020 fell by 53 per cent year-on-year (in mass terms) while demand from technology (including electronics, industrial uses, and dentistry) fell by 18 per cent year-on-year. Overall demand fell by 11 per cent, and while central banks and other supranational organisations (IMF, BIS, etc.) have slowed down their purchases, they remain among the largest sources of gold demand and are largely price-insensitive.
Indeed, data from the IMF covering up to Q1 2020 confirms that these organisations have been increasing their gold holdings almost non-stop since 2009. Given their slow-moving nature, it is reasonable to assume that this demand driver will continue to be supportive for some time.
One key source of demand has seen explosive growth recently. Demand from ETFs and other investment products has surged by 470 per cent year-on-year, becoming the largest contributor of gold demand. This is reflective of a feedback loop: as gold prices start to rise and investors pile into gold ETFs, the product managers must purchase physical bullion to back the certificates they are issuing, putting further upward pressure on gold prices.
This year has already seen the largest flows into gold ETFs since at least 2003: $49 billion or about 900 tonnes of gold have flowed into these products year to date. To put that number in context, the previous record year was 2009 when $19 billion or 646 tonnes of gold flowed into such products. However, with any feedback loop, the unwind can get ugly: if gold falls out of investor favour and gold ETFs see large outflows, the downward pressure on prices will be massive and reinforce a collapse in much the same way as it did the rise.
Technicals and short-term factors are not favourable at
The unwinding of long positioning and subsequent outflows from gold ETFs (and futures to a lesser extent) is just one of the risks on the short-term horizon. Momentum indicators also suggest that gold is overbought at this point: its 14-day RSI has hovered around 80 for the last two weeks, as the price surged by 12 per cent.
This is in stark contrast to the 12 per cent rally from the end of March to mid-July, when the RSI stayed in the 40-70 range and pointed to positive technicals. At the same time that gold appears to be overbought, the US dollar appears to be oversold, with the 14-day RSI of the DXY index hovering in the 20-30 range over the last two weeks. A resurgence in the US dollar, potentially driven by the pick-up in tension with China, would add downward pressure to gold.
Investors are also re-assessing what other assets could offer gold’s properties at a lower cost. While much attention has been paid to gold breaking the US dollar 2,000 level, its 14 per cent rise since the end of June pales in comparison with the 54 per cent rise in silver over the same time. Indeed, the gold/silver ratio is back down to 72, a level last seen in early 2017, after peaking at 124 in mid-March, but remains above its long-term average of 59.
These short-term headwinds have led to our discretionary view moving less bullish, as we take profits on our long gold exposure (as well as our pro-growth exposures, as mentioned last week). Netting this with the bearish view from our systematic process leads us to a more neutral exposure to gold, which we think appropriate until we see some improvement in the short-term technical factors. Such an improvement would then motivate us to re-introduce a bullish view as the longer-term drivers, in particular monetary policy and supply/demand dynamics, remain favourable for the precious metal.