Sustainable Investment: The Challenge For Investors
The Switzerland-based bank talks about the challenges of getting sustainable investment right and how to execute this strategy.
This news service is pleased to share these thoughts from Frédéric Rochat, managing partner at Lombard Odier, on what clients need to know about sustainable investment. The whole sustainability/ESG agenda remains a large part of the wealth sector landscape, even if some of the choices that investors make aren’t as easy to execute as some might have hoped.
The editors are pleased to add these comments to our conversation on this topic; the usual disclaimers apply. Jump into the debate! Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Sustainable investment has become a key topic for private and institutional investors. However, the acronyms used (ESG, ITR, SFDR, etc.), the complexity and the rapid developments in this field leave many investors confused. The fundamental question we are often asked is: why should we, and how can we, integrate sustainability principles into portfolios?
Today, powerful market forces are at work to encourage and facilitate an environmental transition that has become indispensable: consumer pressure, regulatory actions, business model transitions across industries and fair capital allocation by investors.
In such a context, integrating sustainability principles into the construction of portfolios supports a fundamental transition of our economic models. It will also allow for better preservation of invested assets, favouring companies that will benefit from future transitions while reducing exposure to future losers of the continuing revolution.
Environmental stability for sustainable
It is undeniable that functional societies, sustainable economic growth and attractive long-term financial returns rely on environmental stability.
Scientific research has now quantified several global limits that must not be exceeded in order to safeguard this, with measures concerning CO2 emissions, water quality, biodiversity and more. While the situation is alarming, since we have already crossed the alert thresholds for most of them, the science is clear on how to restore or limit the damage caused to our ecosystems.
The environmental transition will be built around four major axes:
Electrification. Electricity is becoming the dominant energy vector. From around 20 per cent of the world's energy demand in 2020, it will rise to over 70 per cent in 2050. To produce electricity, we will have to switch from fossil fuels to cleaner energies (water, wind, solar and possibly nuclear).
Agriculture and nature preservation. Between now and 2050, we will need to feed an additional two billion people while restoring large areas of arable land for reforestation and biodiversity projects. We will have to rethink our production and consumption methods.
Materials. We will have to decouple the trajectory of economic growth from the extraction of raw materials. The "take, make, waste" model must be replaced by "reduce, re-use, recycle." Building materials must be rethought; cars will be shared and their components recycled.
Carbon. The market economy model must be
expanded to include all its externalities. Carbon emissions must
become increasingly expensive, creating the incentive mechanisms
needed for industrial actors to adopt real transition